The dissent likened the majority’s “departing from stare decisis for no legitimate reason” to a “loaded weapon” that threatens respect for the Court and the rule of law itself. Jackson Women’s Health notoriously disposed of the constitutional right to abortion recognized half a century ago in Roe v. But the supermajority has shown little regard for this principle.ĭobbs v. It promotes fairness and stability in the system for judges to ground their rulings in what came before.
Here’s what we learned about the Court’s behavior - and what to watch for in the upcoming term.Īdherence to precedent is a guiding principle of judicial decision-making. The blockbuster Supreme Court term that ended in June was the first full-year opportunity for the 6–3 conservative supermajority to wield power. While there’s much we don’t know, one key data point is what we’ve learned over the last year. The Supreme Court begins its new term on October 3 and will soon consider critical questions about the future of fair elections, affirmative action, and more.
Government Targeting of Minority Communities Show / hide.Campaign Finance in the Courts Show / hide.Gerrymandering & Fair Representation Show / hide.Ensure Every American Can Vote Show / hide.
0 kommentar(er)
